The lengths that meat eaters will go to justify their consumption of animal products.
EpicTrollingCentre here is suggesting that hypothetically we have the ability to feed
all carnivorous animals, such as lions and other predatory animals, a vegan analogue.
The reasoning behind this is that if its right for other animals to eat other animals, therefore
its right for humans to eat other animals.
If its not right for humans, than it should not be right for other animals and therefore
we should hand feed vegan food to the billions upon upon billions of wild animals.
This is just ludicrous.
Not only would it be impossible to capture, house, and care for all wild animals on land
and sea, it would be impossible to feed them a vegan diet as the amount of food necessary
to produce would be in such quantity and cost that would be unfeasible.
It is true meat eating animals do not have a requirement for specifically the meat, but
the nutrients found in the correct proportions within the meat.
Humans do not need to eat animals to get their daily needed nutrients as we have alternatives
that wild animals do not.
Technology has allowed for us to grow better crops with higher yields, transport them more
easily and cheaply, and provide them to a wider range of people at a reduced cost.
This makes being a vegan easy in most parts of the world.
Arguing to absurd ends in an attempt to dismiss veganism is idiotic.
Thats right, we need to eat cows, chickens, pigs and all the other farmed animals otherwise
they will multiply and take over the world.
Seriously?
Perhaps if all of sudden we released all animals held in captivity this would cause some issues,
but no one is suggesting this is likely to happen.
Farmed animals are force bred by humans.
Farmers bred enough animals to match the demand needed to satisfy the consumers.
If demand goes down, so would supply.
If we ever got to a tipping point where farmed animals were being released, there would be
far fewer of them around and they could be taken care of until they live out their natural
life.
Animal populations in the wild match their food source.
Do you see populations explode where a balance in nature is found?
no.
Animals we routinely kill for food are no danger to us, and therefore such justifications
for eating animals is transparently frivolous.
The blood type diet is the brainchild of Peter J. D'Adamo outlined in his book Eat Right
4 Your Type.
He claims that your blood type (A,B,O) is the most important factor in determining a
healthy diet, however the consensus among dieticians, physicians and scientists is that
his theory is not supported by scientific evidence.
D'Adamo claims that blood group O as the hunter, blood group A as the agrarian or cultivator,
blood group B as they nomad, and blood group AB as the enigma.
D'Adamo has received criticism for his book and claims because he has not provided adequate
evidence and explanations on how he reached these conclusions.
D'Adamo has no peer reviewed articles with data supporting his claims.
His claims regarding ABO specific lectins exists in food is not substantiated by established
biochemical research.
His supposed clinical trial has never been published.
What you find here is another quack trying to sell books rather than give any real nutritional
advice.
In regards to your "cave-person" like fangs, have you taken a look at gorillas?
Im sure they make your canines look feeble in comparison, and yet gorillas are nearly
100% herbivores.
Who
would of thought?
A life is a life.
So i guess, there is as much wrong with killing a human as there is mowing your lawn and killing
grass and shrubs.
Obviously you don't think that a life is a life, because we all realize that plants
are fundamentally different from animals.
Sure plants are alive, and so are animals, however plants are not sentient.
Life is not the issue, sentience is.
A plant dying for my survival is not the same as an animal dying for my survival.
I can live a healthy life without eating another animal ever again, but you would not survive
long on an exclusively meat based diet.
This all-to-often comment is poorly thought through, and makes my cringe every time i
have to address it.
Lets hope that i don't hear it again… who are we kidding, right?
So let me see, which of the two does veganism resemble the most:
a) most religious people were brought up by religious parents, or a religious community
and never decided to be religious, but instead had it instilled in them from an early age
b) most religious people believe in a wide range of unconfirmed set of beliefs and dismiss
any criticism that is contrary c) most religious people believe that humans
are special because they are created in god's image and therefore the earth and everything
on it is for our use d) most religious "holy" books outline
specific immoral behaviour as a good e) most religious people feel compelled to
do good because it is commanded, and fear of punishment if they fail to live up to the
demands.
Veganism on the other hand.. a) is often a personal choice made by people
who despite having been brought up to believe in the acceptability of eating and using animals,
have made a change b) Most vegans go vegan for very good reasons,
reasons backed up by leading scientific studies looking into animal behaviour, cognition,
nutrition, causes of disease, environmental impact, resource management, social effects,
and many other factors.
c) Vegans better acknowledge that we too are animals, and yes we may have certain advantages
over other animals (namely our intelligence) we SHARE this world with other beings, and
just like we have moral responsibilities to other humans, we should conduct ourselves
with other species with the same level of care and compassion.
d) Vegans do not rely on supposedly divine books to direct their actions.
We use our intellect to direct our actions so that we conduct ourselves in the most responsible
way.
We take control of our lives and actions and ensure that our lives accurately reflect our
beliefs.
e) Vegans work towards a better future for all sentient animals, humans and none, and
do what is right because its right, not because its making a huge impact or not.
It makes a difference to each and every animal that you allowed killed in your honour.
So what do you think, veganism sounds like a religious person having faith?
not in the slightest.
In regards to protein, spend a few minutes on google and type in "vegan sources of
protein" and you will find all the information you could possibly want.
Its easy, let me show you...
There you have it.
5 stupid comments from 5 different youtubers.
Which comment would you vote to win the Dumbass of the week award?
Would it be:
1) EpicTrollingCentre who suggests that we should feed all wild predatory animals vegan
foods 2) JohnFisher55 who is concerned about being
overrun by farmed animals 3) MasterPalladin who thinks that you should
eat based upon your blood type 4) invid024 who thinks a life is a life irrespective
if its plant or animal or
5) Prog47 who thinks veganism is more like a religious person having faith
Please leave your votes and comments below, and if you enjoyed this video remember to
press the like button and share!
If you enjoyed this video, click the like button below.
To ensure you don't miss out on future content, click the subscribe button and bell to be
notified of new uploads.
Interested in atheist related videos?
Check out my other Youtube channel devoted to atheist and religious content.
Link is in the video description below.
Lastly, if you like the work that I do, and have a few bucks to spare, please consider
becoming a patron of the channel by supporting my Patreon project.
I am more then halfway to reaching my $100 a month goal.
Please help if you can!
Thank you for your ongoing support and as always thanks for watching.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét