Waching daily Dec 31 2018

BOMBSHELL! Rudy Giuliani Says Mueller Was The INSURANCE POLICY To Remove Trump

so let's shift gears you've said we've heard predictions for well over a year

now because this investigation by bomb mother's gone on for some time as you

know better than anyone and we've heard lots can be done by Thanksgiving is

gonna be done by the end of the year what's your ultimatum before this my

ultimatum is put up a shut up Bob I mean you know what do you have that there are

those of us believe you don't have anything on collusion and by the way if

you did it's not a crime so what the heck are you doing do you have anything

that shows the president knighted States was involved in a conspiracy to hack the

DNC with Russia of course you don't but if you do put out a report I'll give it

to the Justice Department let them review it make sure it's not classified

whatever put out a report we're ready to rebut it I have the report ready for two

months that we can show no we can we've live it my mother might be coming out in

February so that what you're hearing or what what's your Senate oh gosh almighty

first key was coming out in March and then in May and then and then he and

then he got we're we're in now the fourth degree of separation from the non

crime collusion we went to the non crime obstruction to justice that didn't work

out for him so then he moved on to campaign contributions which by the way

are not violative of the campaign finance law you can pay a judgment or a

claim against you that's not a campaign expense the Edwards case determined that

that's another non crime they're investigating that and then and then

then they're looking at now the the Russia tower well they should go to

Moscow there is no tower get built it didn't get beyond a non-binding

letter of intent which is like a wish and so okay Bob

how much forget those other three what do you got on what do you have on

collusion exactly we don't have a darn thing on closure the whole thing is a

phony well you recently you've said the

president will not speak to Bob Muller over your dead body you know why you'll

say conversations are ongoing because if they're unethical because of their

unethical behavior I mean then or grossly negligent behavior all those

texts of struck and page deleted after they find out that struck is is texting

that he hates Trump that he's going to get him that

he's going to stop him and if he can't stop me

an insurance policy to get him out of office I believe Muller is the insurance

policy to get him out of office they said it's a bunch of Santa struck

was his first investigator how is it that the ones eliminated all the ones

that he did when he was working for Muller all of a sudden they wipe out his

phone and the ones missing are the ones when he was working from mullet why

because just maybe it would be very embarrassing if he would say the same

things while working for the holier-than-thou special counsel and he

was saying I hate Trump I'm gonna get Trump we're gonna get him anyway we have

we're framing Flynn we're not gonna tell him he has a right to counsel and call

me approve that call me even said I wouldn't have gotten away with that with

a more experienced administration we were gonna trap him we got a statement

he's gonna contradict it we're not gonna show him the statement to refresh his

recollection I don't know that could all be there so these are the person who

determined what to eliminate unless this is a lie with his records officer

Muller's records officer who says that there was nothing of interest there it's

hard to believe as it struck him page all of a sudden decided we're not gonna

tweet anymore when I could text anymore about Donald Trump they seem to be

obsessively compulsively texting about him yeah I mean I don't know what kind

of lovers they were if they were texting about that all that owner should have

said that that's terrible

this is ridiculous if this happened on the other side if you imagine if he

asked us for very relevant text and we said oh we had them but we just we

eliminated them part of our record-keeping we just eliminated the

text between the president and 25 resident and these are 19,000 we've

never seen and will now never see as far as I can tell I mean I'm hoping there's

a way to reproduce reproduce but I mean Texas Tech's only last for a little with

an eye like emails I do this work cybersecurity work and tech so hard to

get I mean that's a legitimate he usually said accepting stolen property

is not a crime anyway in another interview and some thought you were

opening the door to the idea that stolen property in the form of hacked emails

may have been accepted by the Trump campaign and it's

a First Amendment issue right it isn't a stolen property I mean it's stolen

property but it has a different nature when it's information so let's take the

pentagon papers pentagon pairs with stolen property weren't they they were

stolen from the Pentagon about the New York Times in the Washington Post nobody

went to jail the New York Times The Washington Post we've had revelations

during the Bush administration the Abu Ghraib prison table Grob well all of

that is stolen property taken from the government against the law once it gets

to a media publication they can publish it they they can publish it for the

purpose of informing people well you can't put you can't put Assange in a

different position that he was a guy that communicate you might not like what

he communicates but he was a media facility he was putting that information

out every newspaper station grabbed it and public there was not coordination

you're saying between the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks none yeah I was with

Donald Trump day in and day out for the last four months of the campaign he was

as surprised as I was about the WikiLeaks disclosures sometimes

surprised to the extent of oh my god did they really say that we were wondering

is it true and I they never denied it the thing that's missing here is the

thing that really got Hillary is not so much as they were revealed but they were

true she actually had people as bad as that and she really was cheating on the

debates she really was getting from Donna

Brazile the questions beforehand she really did completely screw Bernie

Sanders every bit of that was absolutely true just like the Pentagon Papers put a

different view on Vietnam just put a different view on Hillary Clinton the

country from getting a president who was deeply flawed not right to hack still a

crime people who did it should go to jail but no press person or person

disseminating that for the purpose of informing did anything wrong all right

equal time scare voters this year saying the Mets are winners what say you about

the Yankees good luck my good good friend I love them and I have a lot of

met friends who a good friends might even relatives

I have deep pity for them sorry for them and I love the Mets and the National

League I root for them and I feel sorry for the Met fans but hey you can't be 27

World Championship I will bring in Robert Driscoll of past DOJ Fame and

also the attorney for Maria butene of the Russian agent who just pled out get

a little more insight from you on this Rudy Giuliani you know is the

president's defense attorney he can sort of want whatever he wants from robert

muller but can't really force the hand kenny

yeah i'm reminded by think was kelly who said you know the enemy gets a vote as

to when the war ends you know he can want it but it's he's not really in

control it'll end when muller says it ends this is Rudy Giuliani also this

morning on Fox and Friends sort of issuing the ultimatum take a listen

we'll get your thoughts my ultimatum is put up a shut up Bob I mean you know

what do you have that there are those of us who believe you don't have anything

on collusion and by the way if you did it's not a crime so what the heck are

you doing do you have anything that shows the president is States was

involved in a conspiracy to hack the DNC with Russia of course you don't have you

seen anything I mean he's right from a public perspective but that's kind of

meaningless because you don't know what what Muller has you doing what a good

defense Lord would do he's trying to press for the end of the case but I mean

he's you know in some sense it's a bluff because he doesn't know what Muller has

so he's just saying you don't have anything I haven't seen anything and

come up with it and Muller may or Muller may not one thing that Muller has

appears to have been very strategic and number one is not leaking out of his

office it's unbelievable how tight they have kept things but - there are all

these little crumbs and all of these little and all these filings much of

which are redacted but then there's these key points how close does it

appear to you that Muller has gotten to the inner circle of Trump world in this

sense it is very hard to judge that and I think that lawyers who do are at great

peril because this case isn't going to end in an

indictment of the President as Meenakshi - candidate the president under DOJ

rules and where it's going to end in a report a lot of the tea leaves we would

normally read you can't read in this case so for example the fact that that

people are having sentencings usually wouldn't sentence co-operators until

they were done cooperating in a trial so in a normal case you'd say well they're

sentencing the co-operators the principal's off the hook but you can't

conclude that here because the the end result may be a report to Congress not

an indictment in a trial he may not need and you know Flynn or Manta Ford or

anyone to testify the trial they just may need their statements in a report so

it's very hard to judge the normal and I think a lot of the kind of classic

analysis that goes on misses that point that motoring a very different task here

he's finishing a report not necessarily into an indictment it seems though it's

very clear he's still in the evidence gathering stage we we know about the

Supreme Court case about which there is unbelievable secrecy says you know

sealed subpoenas and then clearing floors of courthouses when they have

arguments about it and now our argument written arguments to the Supreme Court

tomorrow yeah is there anything to read into that again it's it's impossible

other than speculation I mean I think one thing to keep in mind is appellate

courts particular Supreme Court are much more interested in jurisdictional issues

than either the public or lower courts and so when you have a foreign

government and a foreign owned entity there's a question of whether there's US

jurisdiction whatever was in that briefing Chief Justice Roberts saw

something that caught his eye and wants to hear a little bit more but I think

it's hard to know whether that's a banking issue whether it's something

else either way it does show you though that this isn't over yet

right it seems to this seems to indicate the opposite of what Rudy Giuliani's

Christmas wishes right I mean there's still clearly some some threads to

pursue yes some things are you know hinting that it could be oh you know

over in the medium term it'll be two years in March I think that may be a

goal that a special prosecutor might set but I just don't think you can I mean

there's still active litigation going on because obviously if this these

documents get turned over from country a what's in them and does

where does that lead all right we may not even know whether they get turned

over or not considering how much secrecy surrounds that all right arguments do I

think it's by 5:00 p.m. tomorrow so we'll see what is unsealed on that mr.

Driscoll always good to see you counselor good see you hi thank you god

bless you and God bless america