Thứ Sáu, 19 tháng 5, 2017

Waching daily May 20 2017

GAME CHANGER President Trump Just Gave Sheriff Clarke The Job Of A Lifetime!

By Paris Swade

Sheriff Clarke is now going to be joining the Trump administration.

He announced it on the Vicki McKenna show, according to the Gateway Pundit.

Here is the tweet from Vicki McKenna.

Sheriff Clarke made this announcement and said that he would be joining the Trump administration

in the Department of Homeland Security.

Sheriff David Clarke will now be the assistant secretary in the Department of Homeland Security,

according to the Budget Pundit.

If you remember, this is what Sheriff David Clarke had to say about the second amendment.

Trump and Mr. David Clarke are going to kick butt and take names together.

Share this post everywhere and comment �Welcome Aboard Sheriff!�

Let�s share this so much that he sees it and smiles.

For more infomation >> GAME CHANGER President Trump Just Gave Sheriff Clarke The Job Of A Lifetime! - Duration: 1:14.

-------------------------------------------

[ENG SUB] 2017.05.14 Contribution prepared by #ParkShinHye #박신혜 at #PinkRun #Gwangju Marathon event - Duration: 1:56.

Subtitles by @MohamedSunbae

Awesome!

Oh, why at the back there

There are quite a number of broadcasters coming.

Hello.

Alright. Here is that everyone.. Should we move front? Yes.

You have to see closer.

Okay.

Pretty right?

Yes.

Let's ask for a word from those who came.

Hello everyone. I am Park Shin-hye. Nice to meet you.

It isn't really easy to maintain such condition from early morning.

How would she have bothered herself from this morning to come here.

How do you maintain your health?

I usually do Pilates and aerobic exercise.

I was not good in running. I was really bad at aerobic exercises.

But as I ran daily,my lung capacity grew and I felt great.

Many people would have prepared well for today's marathon.

I hope everyone would do best.

I see.

Today, there are people who came to run 5 km and some 10km.

She encouraged all of us to run well.

Alright. She participated so that Pinkrun will be well known

Not only, but she also came with contribution.

We will first continue with contribution ceremony.

Would you prepare for this?

The envelop is also in pink. The contribution box has been prepared too.

Contribution prepared by Park Shin-hye.

Okay, now you will put it in but as you have done several times, you would know.

You shouldn't throw in but put half in and smile on the camera.

May I kindly ask you.

Okay. Contribution by Park Shin-hye.

For more infomation >> [ENG SUB] 2017.05.14 Contribution prepared by #ParkShinHye #박신혜 at #PinkRun #Gwangju Marathon event - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

Camo MC — "Meditando entre nubes" [Video Oficial] by. Plane Films x Highest Music - Duration: 2:50.

For more infomation >> Camo MC — "Meditando entre nubes" [Video Oficial] by. Plane Films x Highest Music - Duration: 2:50.

-------------------------------------------

Check out the Franklin Armory F-17 WSM AR15. Awesome! - Duration: 7:39.

hi this is Joel Persinger thank you for

watching my videos are really

appreciated I am the gun guy I'm very

grateful that you're watching I got a

great rifle for you today and that is

this rifle from Franklin Armory I've

gotten a lot of things from Franklin

armory and I got to tell you every time

I get something from the mind impressed

and that is the case here as well they

sent me this to review and I really

really liked it it's it's got a lot of

great features on it it has a heavy bull

barrel that is a 20 inch bull barrel

it's hard code anodized the upper and

lower both forged I like the fact that

there's an adjustment screw in the lower

to make it adjustable so that you can

get rid of the upper lower play because

as you know from shooting ar-15s if you

shot them at all or if you have them

sometimes there's that little bit of

wiggle in there and that little screw

helps you tighten that up that gets rid

of that play in the upper and lower that

hopefully will mean an increase in

accuracy gotta tell you this rifle is

extremely accurate unfortunately as you

can see I didn't have a decent optic to

put on it they sent it without any

sights as a TD and so all I had was this

cheap e red dot but I got to tell you

even with a 4 MOA dot and a hundred

yards I got aced I got a 2 inch group

with a 4 MOA dot and I had a decent

optic on this thing I do willing to bet

you my group would have been a quarter

of an inch or less and I just didn't

have one to put on it it's really

unfortunate because I I really could

have demonstrated the accuracy with the

rifle but this is the F 17 from Franklin

Armory it's a little bit different model

than some of the others there are

several models this I believe is the V

s4 I hope I guess that right I liked

several things about this gun I got to

tell you I really like the heft of it

it's heavy it's solid you can tell the

lower and upper are really really

strongly built

I love the heavy barrel the accuracy is

outstanding I really like this four grip

it is solid and it just fits your hand I

got to tell you every time I've handed

this rifle to someone we first unpacked

it and picked it up everybody said wow

that's on I love the

orgrim it's just a nice around it's just

a cylinder right I mean it's pretty

stinkin simple but I got to tell you it

just is about as comfortable as

comfortable gifts the stock is solid

it's a straight stock but it's solid as

a rock

in general the the gun is just awesome

I'm really really impressed with the

build quality I'm impressed with the

accuracy I'm incredibly impressed with

the rifle but like I said I'm kind of a

fan of Franklin armory stuff anyway so

when they make something I got to be

honest I'm not particularly surprised

when it's made really well and when it

functions really well now I do have two

issues with the gun having shot it a lot

and one is that and this is a minor

thing and that is that there is no I

knew there would not be a last round

bolt hold-open there just isn't going to

be with a 17 however there is also no

manual way to lock the ball so so I can

push on the bottom of the ping-pong

paddle and it will hold it until I let

go and then it closes up it would be

nice to have a manual bolt hold-open

it's kind of minor but it would be

pretty cool if it had one it doesn't

that's the that's one detractor for it

but frankly it's such a minor detractor

that it wouldn't keep me from from

purchasing the rifle if i wanted to

purchase one it is a terrific rifle now

the other issue is more of a personal

nervousness if you want to call it that

and that is it's a we're talking about a

rimfire cartridge here and the way you

have to load the mags is you have to put

pressure on the rim which is the primer

in order to slide the the round in and

then for the next round you have to put

pressure on the rim of the cartridge

again to slide the round in and then you

have to do it again and as the spring

begins to compress that's more and more

pressure on the rim of the cartridge

which is the primer now I've been a

reloader for a long time and you can

tell by the you know the powder and

primers and reloading stuff and the MEK

wrapper back there like that one of the

things that makes me the most nervous is

the way people handle primers because

primers can go pop and they can do it

with a vengeance now I've got my my

round in my hand and I have to put

pressure on the rim of the cartridges

where the prime

is in order to load the cartridge I

would like to have seen some kind of a

setup on this mag that would be maybe

similar to the Ruger pistol mags for the

mark one more two more three series and

that is a little little thing on the end

that I can grab and pull down a little

bit take the pressure off of that as I

feed the round in so there's I'm not

putting I'm not actually pushing the

follower in the spring in on the on the

primer I'm actually just sliding it in

very nicely right now you're putting the

full pressure on the primer as you load

the mag and that is one design element

about this gun that I would say I don't

like as a result I didn't shoot I didn't

load more about five or six rounds in it

because maybe nervous

no that's personal nervousness it may

never have made a difference as far as

the actual firing of the gun is

concerned but it did bug the car out of

me

so I loaded five six rounds and want to

try to get in too much pressure I just

the idea of having a round go off while

I've got it in my hand really really

disturb me so that's the only detraction

I could think of it's not what the rifle

itself it's with the magazines now other

than that the mags are made like rocks I

mean I think I could run this Megara

with my truck and it would still work I

mixed at this at the solid aspect of the

mag I mean I don't think you could break

it with a hammer it's awesome the only

that's the only thing I would add if I

were them as I would add a way to be

able to pull it down with my fingers so

I can load the rounds without having to

put pressure on the primer other than

that this rifle shoots awesome it's

incredibly accurate as you can see it is

a terrific gun in every respect I am

incredibly impressed so there is the

Franklin Armory winchester super mag in

17 it's a terrific gun if you get your

hands on one check it out now for

California the nice thing about it is

sets it's a rimfire guess what you've

got a standard mag release and a

10-round Meg so if you're looking for a

rifle that you want to be able to buy

and use as normal the way you should use

an AR this one will get the job done

because since it's a rimfire at least as

far as we can tell so far it is not

involved in the assault weapons ban per

se so if you want to have features on it

or want to have a regular

attachable mag which you can insert and

push your mag release and take it right

out you can do that in the state of

California because it is a rimfire

cartridge and by the way if you haven't

checked out the 17 super winchester

super mag that thing rocks I mean it

just rocks out of the barrel screaming

fast and screaming accurate so check it

out you can you can look in the

description of the video there is a link

to Franklin Armory and link to the

specific rifle you can check it out

there it is a terrific rifle I'm very

grateful to Franklin armory for sending

it to me thank you very much for

watching have a great week please check

out second called offense if you get a

chance look for us on patreon and

certainly join the National Rifle

Association there's links for all of

that stuff plus the gun guy TV store in

the description all of those help the

channel they also help the Second

Amendment and that's that's the most

important thing I think have a great

week and be safe

For more infomation >> Check out the Franklin Armory F-17 WSM AR15. Awesome! - Duration: 7:39.

-------------------------------------------

How To Avoid Copyright Strikes - Advice For Small YouTubers Collab And Struggles | Active Problems - Duration: 23:23.

How To Avoid Copyright Strikes - Advice For Small YouTubers Collab And Struggles | Active Problems

For more infomation >> How To Avoid Copyright Strikes - Advice For Small YouTubers Collab And Struggles | Active Problems - Duration: 23:23.

-------------------------------------------

Switzerland Completely Abolished Mammography Screenings Here's Why You Should Probably Never Get One - Duration: 15:16.

Switzerland Completely Abolished Mammography Screenings Here�s Why You Should Probably

Never Get One

Cancer, Healthcare, Recent Articles 8:00 AM A+A-PRINTEMAIL

In 2013, the Swiss Medical Board, an independent health technology assessment initiative, was

requested to prepare a review of mammography screening.

The team of medical professionals included a medical ethicist, a clinical epidemiologist,

a pharmacologist, an oncologic surgeon, a nurse scientist, a lawyer, and a health economist.

Two of those members, Nikola Biller-Andorno, M.D. Ph.

D. and Peter Juni, M.D, opened up about the project in the New England Journal of Medicine.

They said:

�As we embarked on the project, we were aware of the controversies that have surrounded

mammography screening for the past 10-15 years.

When we received the available evidence and contemplated its implications in detail, however,

we became increasingly concerned.�

In 2016, it is estimated that approximately 246,660 new cases of invasive breast cancer

will be diagnosed in women in the United States as well as 61,000 new cases of non-invasive

breast cancer.

Mammograms continue to be touted as the most effective screening tool we have today to

find breast cancer.

However, these two doctors were shocked to discover that there is minimal evidence that

actually indicates that the benefits of mammography screening outweigh the harms.

�The relative risk reduction of approximately 20 percent in breast-cancer mortality associated

with mammography that is currently described by most expert panels came at the price of

a considerable diagnostic cascade, with repeat mammography, subsequent biopsies, and over-diagnosis

of breast cancers � cancers that would never have become clinically apparent.�

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study, which was conducted over the course of 25

years, concluded that 106 of 484 screen-detected cancers were over-diagnosed.

The doctors explained:

�This means that 106 of the 44,925 healthy women in the screening group were diagnosed

with and treated for breast cancer unnecessarily, which resulted in needless surgical interventions,

radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or some combination of these therapies.�

The fact that the benefits of this form of cancer screening are so overestimated seems

worrisome for the medical community and patients at large.

How, in this day and age, do we not have more awareness, more answers, and better technology?

Another review of 10 trials involving more than 600,000 women discovered no evidence

that mammography screening was effective on overall mortality.

This caused concern over the benefits of the medical practice.

A survey of U.S. women�s views on the mammography screenings discovered that 71.5 percent of

women think that it lessened risk of death from breast cancer by half, while 72.1 percent

believed that 80 deaths could be avoided per each 1,000 women screened.

Their perceptions were gravely over-calculated.

In fact, when looking at the real numbers, mammography results in a risk reduction of

20 percent and only 1 death can be prevented per 1,000 women screened.

The Swiss Medical Board report became public in February 2014, provoking the board to advise

that the quality of mammography screening ought to be evaluated and that women should

be educated about both the benefits and the harms of the medical practice.

The report created controversy within the Swiss medical community, even though it supports

a growing perspective around the world that mammography for breast cancer screening in

asymptomatic populations is outdated and harmful at best.

When reviewing the data in regards to every breast cancer death prevented in U.S. women

over a 10-year period of yearly screening starting at the age of 50, you will find that:

490-670 women usually have a false positive mammogram with repeat examination

70-100 women usually have an unnecessary biopsy

3-14 women were the victim of over-diagnosed breast cancer that would never reach clinical

relevance

Furthermore, up to 50 percent of women have breast tissue that is dense.

This makes it very hard to read mammograms correctly, as dense breast tissue and cancer

both show up white on an X-ray.

Due to the lack of evidence in support of mammography and the clear potential risks

involved with them, the board chose to recommend cancelling mammography-screening programs

altogether.

Although their recommendations are not legally binding, the report caused an uproar amongst

Swiss cancer experts and organizations.

The doctors on board reported:

�One of the main arguments used against it was that it contradicted the global consensus

of leading experts in the field� Another argument was that the report unsettled women,

but we wonder how to avoid unsettling women, given the available evidence.�

It�s clearly no mystery why the board become increasingly concerned about their researcher.

The �evidence� simply does not back up the global consensus of other experiences

in the field suggesting that mammograms were safe and capable of saving lives.

When it comes down to it, we are dealing with outdated clinical trials, the benefits do

not clearly outweigh the harms, and women�s perceptions of mammography benefits do not

match reality,

More Information On Breast Screenings

I believe that if you did have a tumor, the last thing you would want to do is crush that

tumor between two plates, because that would spread it.

� Dr. Sarah Mybill, General Practitioner (taken from the documentary trailer below)

I think if a woman from the age of 50 has a mammogram every year, or every two years,

she�s going to get breast cancer as a direct result from that � Dr. Patrick Kingsley,

Clinical Ecologist (take from the documentary trailer below)

In 2011, 220,097 women and 2,078 men in the United States were diagnosed with breast cancer,

and 40,931 women and 443 men in the United States died from breast cancer.

It has become the most common type of cancer among women.

Below is a trailer to a documentary entitled, �The Promise.� The film interviews various

researchers, scientists, doctors (and more), all of whom are hoping to shed light on a

practice which is turning out to be not only useless, but harmful to those taking part.

There is more information below the video, but I highly recommend you watch the documentary.

There is a wealth of scientific data concluding that mammograms are not, as the CDC claims,

the most effective way to detect breast cancer.

In fact, having a mammogram is likely the last thing you want to do if you have breast

cancer.

A study published in The European Journal of Public Healthtitled �Trends in breast

cancer stage distribution before, during and after introduction of a screening programme

in Norway� found that breast screenings actually increase the incidence of localized

stage cancers without reducing the incidence of advanced cancers.

The study, which used a huge population sample of 1.8 million Norwegian women diagnosed with

breast cancer from 1987 � 2010, found that:

�The annual incidence of localized breast cancer among women aged 50�69 years rose

from 63.9 per 100 000 before the introduction of screening to 141.2 afterwards, corresponding

to a ratio of 2.21 (95% confidence interval: 2.10; 2.32).

�The incidence of more advanced cancers increased from 86.9 to 117.3 per 100 000 afterwards,

corresponding to a 1.35 (1.29; 1.42)-fold increase.

Advanced cancers also increased among younger women not eligible for screening, whereas

their incidence of localized cancers remained nearly constant.�

This study outlines how Norway�s breast screening program has actually increased the

chance of being diagnosed with early stage breast cancer by more than 200%, as well contributing

to an increased chance of receiving advanced stage breast cancer diagnosis by 35%.

This is the opposite of what mammograms are supposed to do; if they were useful then the

incidence of cancers would be lower and not higher.

The study concluded that:

Incidence of localized breast cancer increased significantly among women aged 50�69 years

old after introduction of screening, while the incidence of more advanced cancers was

not reduced in the same period when compared to the younger unscreened age group.

It�s important to note that, �although the study did measure the impact of Norway�s

breast screening programme, a comparison of trends between participants and non-participants

in the age group eligible for screening warrants further investigation.

Also the causal link between stage distribution and mortality needs to be investigated in

the context of screening.�

A paper published in 2011 in the British Medical Journal set out to prove that breast screening

by mammography is associated with a steeper fall in mortality cancer compared to other

countries who were not offering this service.

They did not expect to find the complete opposite; they found a drop in breast cancer mortality

among women who were not screened.

They concluded that the recent downward trend in breast cancer mortality had nothing to

do with screening and everything to do with improvements in treatment and service provision.

The new data published in the BMJ now suggests that none of the gratifying falls in breast

cancer can be attributed to screening and that the very existence of a NHSBSP (national

breast screening programme) should be questioned.

Unless there is public pressure for an independent inquiry to challenge the status quo, it will

be business as usual for the screening programme.

Furthermore, the Department of Health has painted itself into a corner and it is no

longer a question of scientific debate � the subject has become too politicized by those

who like to avoid U-turns at all costs.

� Michael Baum, Professor Emeritus of Surgery and visiting Professor of Medical Humanities

at University College London, is a leading British surgical oncologist who specializes

in breast cancer treatment

This would be an asymptomatic woman walking along the high street, having a mammogram,

and then two weeks later she�s told she has to have a mastectomy.

This is so cruel that it should make you weep.

(quote taken from the documentary trailer above)

As Sayer Ji, founder of Greenmedinfo.com points out, a National Cancer Institute commissioned

expert panel concluded that �early stage cancers� are not cancer, they are benign

or indolent growths.

This means that millions of women were wrongly diagnosed with breast cancer over the past

few decades and have been subjected to harmful treatment, when they would have been better

off leaving it untreated or diagnosed; frighteningly, it is not uncommon for a breast cancer misdiagnosis

to occur.

Another study that was recently published in the British Medical Journal concluded that

regular mammogram screenings do not reduce breast cancer death rates.

And they found no evidence to suggest that mammograms are more effective than personal

breast exams at detecting cancer in the designated age group.

The study involved 90, 000 Canadian women and compared breast cancer incidence and mortality

up to 25 years in women aged 40-59.

The study was conducted over a period of 25 years.

Many Studies Showing The Same Thing

The sheer number of studies that have been published on breast mammography examinations

and their failure to produce a benefit in screened populations is overwhelming.

What�s even more disturbing is the fact that these types of examinations have also

been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer, and to have negative implications

for both physical and mental health.

U-turns do not embarrass clinical scientists, unlike politicians: if the evidence changes

then our minds must change.

As the national programme began to run its course, two disturbing observations made me

begin to question my original support.

First, about 10 years after the initiation of the service, updated analyses of the original

data set by independent groups in Europe and the US found that the initial estimate of

benefit in the reduction of breast cancer mortality was grossly exaggerated.

� Michael Baum, Professor Emeritus of Surgery and visiting Professor of Medical Humanities

at University College London, is a leading British surgical oncologist who specializes

in breast cancer treatment

For more infomation >> Switzerland Completely Abolished Mammography Screenings Here's Why You Should Probably Never Get One - Duration: 15:16.

-------------------------------------------

Cứ 100 Người Thì 99 Người Chưa Biết 25 Loại Thực Phẩm Cực Độc Thà Ckết Cũng Không Được Ăn Này - Duration: 12:03.

For more infomation >> Cứ 100 Người Thì 99 Người Chưa Biết 25 Loại Thực Phẩm Cực Độc Thà Ckết Cũng Không Được Ăn Này - Duration: 12:03.

-------------------------------------------

THE UNITED STATES TRIED TO DETONATE A NUCLEAR WEAPON ON THE MOON - Duration: 5:36.

THE UNITED STATES TRIED TO DETONATE A NUCLEAR WEAPON ON THE MOON & SOMEBODY RESPONDED WHEN

WE DID

In the 1950s, Colonel Ross Dedrickson was responsible for maintaining the inventory

of the nuclear weapon stockpile for the AEC, and for accompanying security teams checking

out the security of the weapons, among many other duties.

As his obituary states:

He was assigned to the US Atomic Energy Commission.

A long service with the Energy Commission between 1950-1958 included, contract administration

duties at Nevada test sites, Pacific Nuclear Test Area west of Hawaii, nuclear weapon manufacturing

and quality assurance in Albuquerque, and inspection of nuclear and non-nuclear facilities

throughout the country.

He served with the 5th Air Force in Japan and later as a ranking Colonel, Officer in

Charge of the Pacific Unified Command (TM)s alternate �command and control center�

in Hawaii.

In 1962, he was transferred and served as Deputy for Material for the 832 Air Division

at Canon Air Force Base, Clovis, New Mexico.

He retired from the USAF in 1964.

He is one of hundreds of military whistleblowers with verified backgrounds to have been brought

forth by Dr. Steven Greer�s Disclosure Project.

His testimony about UFOs � specifically about UFOs and nuclear weapons � can be

corroborated by a wealth of information and evidence that�s now available within the

public domain.

(To read more about a few of these encounters, click here.)

Many of these whistleblowers have made multiple appearances at the National Press Club in

an effort to get this information out to the world, with the most recent example being

the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure, which took place a few years ago.

With such a professional background, working in the places he has worked, it�s safe to

infer he was privy to sensitive information on a number of subjects.

This isn�t just a random high-ranking military whistleblower talking about a random issue.

There are many whistleblowers and documents clearly outlining a decades-long relationship

between UFOs and nuclear storage facilities and test sites.

A number of these incidents have visual confirmation, along with air and ground radar confirmation

as well.

In the interview , Dedrickson explains how the American government tried to detonate

a nuclear weapon on the moon, but were prevented from doing so.

As far as the mainstream goes, it�s public knowledge that a declassified report by the

Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center from June 1959 shows just how seriously they considered

the plan, called Project A119.

In general, they wanted to investigate the capability of weapons in space, as well as

gain further insight into the space environment and the detonation of nuclear devices within

it.

As far as the information , that probably goes deeper into the Black Budget.

It�s interesting how the world is so into television shows like Stranger Things, which

depicts the Department of Energy and their involvement with otherworldly creatures and

other strange facts, yet so willing to ignore a high ranking American Colonel who held very

sensitive positions at the Department of Energy for years, at a time when all of this nuclear

development was really hot.

He is the real deal and it�s interesting to ponder what he might really know.

�I also learned about incidents involving nuclear weapons, and among these incidents

were a couple of nuclear weapons sent into space were destroyed by the extraterrestrials.

. . . At the very end of the 70s and the early 80s, we attempted to put a nuclear weapon

on the moon and explode it for scientific measurements and other things, which was not

acceptable to the extraterrestrials.

They destroyed the weapon before it got to

the moon.�

For more infomation >> THE UNITED STATES TRIED TO DETONATE A NUCLEAR WEAPON ON THE MOON - Duration: 5:36.

-------------------------------------------

Doraemon Mới Nhất 2017 - Doraemon 3 - Nobita no Machi SOS! Japan - 04 | どらえもん 3 ー のびた の まち そS! じゃぱん - Duration: 16:15.

For more infomation >> Doraemon Mới Nhất 2017 - Doraemon 3 - Nobita no Machi SOS! Japan - 04 | どらえもん 3 ー のびた の まち そS! じゃぱん - Duration: 16:15.

-------------------------------------------

15 "Fictional" Places You Didn't Know Actually Exist - Duration: 7:57.

• How do you film on a planet that doesn't exist? How did Tolkien come up with the world

of Middle Earth? Here are 15 fictional places you didn't know actually existed.

15 – Pokémon – the regions (Kanto etc.) • At least seven of the regions from the

Pokémon games are based on real world locations – and at least four of them closely resemble

regions in Japan. • Kanto for instance is an actual Japanese

region that is part of the greater Tokyo area. • Pallet town however is inspired by the

hometown of Pokémon creator Satoshi Tajiri, who wanted to recapture the Japan of the 1960s,

before the economic boom, with its forests connecting each town.

14 – Lord of the Rings (books) – Middle Earth locations

• Many of the locations in J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy were inspired by

the city of Birmingham and its surroundings in the north of England.

• Tolkien grew up in a place called 'Sarehole', which was the basis for The Shire. The black

tower of Isengard closely resembles images of Birmingham University which has it's

own central tower; and Mordor is directly inspired by the 'Black Country', named

for all the smoke that billowed from the chimneys of the mining area.

13 – Spirited Away • A festival in Japan inspired Miyazaki

to make 'Spirited Away' - but its setting has more in common with two places in China

and Taiwan. • Hongyadon in the centre of the Chinese

city of Chongqing [chong-ching] shares similarities with the Bath House from the film, with its

ancient buildings stacked on top of one another. • The street of 'Jiufen', Taiwan was

the central inspiration for the setting of the film.

• Its combination of Japanese and Chinese influences can be seen in the architecture

and food stalls in the film. 12 – Up – Paradise Falls

• Throughout the Pixar film UP, the two protagonists are searching for the mythical

location of Paradise Falls. • The fictional location of the film is

directly modelled after 'Angel Falls' in Venezuela, home to the largest uninterrupted

waterfall in the world. • The flat-topped mountains of Paradise

falls are actually called "tepui". Pixar sent a team to Venezuela to sketch, film and

photograph Angel Falls and the tepui as a guide for designing Paradise Falls.

11 – Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon – bamboo forest

• The memorable fight scene in Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, where the two fighters

defy gravity by walking on the tops of trees was actually staged in a real life location.

• No studios were used; instead the crew set up in Anhui Bamboo Forest in China – the

largest such forest in the country. • The actors performed their stunts in the

trees, and computers were only used to digitally remove the wires holding them up.

10 – Star Wars - Tatooine • When filming the original 'Star Wars'

film in 1976, George Lucas and crew scouted out locations in Tunisia, North Africa to

serve as the planet of Tatooine, home to Luke Skywalker.

• Djerba Island is where "Ben's" house can be found. When Obi-Wan isn't staying

there, local fishermen use it for storage. • The igloo that is Luke's house is located

in Tozeur, and was rebuilt for the filming of the prequels.

• If you want to stay in Luke's home you can visit Hotel Sidri Driss in Matmata.

9 –Twin Peaks • David Lynch and Mark Frost's surreal

series Twin Peaks was set in a fictional town in Oregon, but many of the exteriors filmed

in Washington State. • Snoqualmie is the primary location, and

is home to the famous Great Northern Hotel (actually Salish Lodge) and the iconic waterfalls.

• The Double R Diner that serves as the hub for much of the series is actually "Twede's

Café" in North Bend, Washington. 8 – Disneyland/Sleeping Beauty Castle - NEUSCHWANSTEIN

CASTLE • Disney are known for using many real world

locations as inspiration for their films, but even the castle at Disneyland is based

on an actual castle - Neuschwanstein Castle in south-west Bavaria to be exact.

• Built by the reclusive King, Ludwig II of Bavaria, known as "the Fairy-tale King",

it inspired Walt Disney in his designs for Disneyland after he visited prior to building

his theme park. • Most of the Disney towns and castles share

more than a passing resemblance to locations in real life, from Beauty and the Beast to

Frozen. 7 – Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

• In Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, the Doctor and his Father go in search of

the mythical Holy Grail – one thing that isn't mythical is the location of the Canyon

city where he finds the grail. • 'The Canyon of the Crescent moon'

as they call it in the film is in the Jordanian city of Petra. The sandstone canyon leads

to 'The Treasury', which is carved, into the rock.

• In the movie the characters are seen venturing deep into the temple, although in real life

there is not much inside at all. 6 – Batman – Arkham Asylum

• 'Arkham Asylum', is the fictional prison used to house many of Batman's arch

villains, and was originated by writer Dennis O'Neal in 1974.

• O'Neal named the facility after the 'Arkham Sanatorium' and town created by

writer H. P. Lovecraft. • Lovecraft used the Danvers State Hospital,

an asylum in rural Massachusetts as his inspiration. • The infamous hospital opened in 1878 but

its methods fell out of favour in the 1960s and by 1992 it had been closed down.

• If for some reason you wanted to live at Arkham Asylum, apartments were recently

built there. 5 – Avatar – Pandora

• The computer-generated world of 'Pandora'

in James Cameron's Avatar may seem fantastical but it is openly modelled after two real world

locations in China. • The "yellow mountains" of Anhui and

the Southern Sky column in Hunan are combined to create Pandora and the Hallelujah Mountains,

as they are known in the film. • The local government named the massive

pillars after the success of the film, but later denied doing so after there was an outcry

from the local people. 4 – The Truman Show - Seahaven

• The fictional world of 'Seahaven' in the Truman Show turned out to be too good

to be true for Jim Carey's character. • Rather than being some elaborate Hollywood

set though, the movie was actually filmed on location in the appropriately named Seaside,

Florida. • The entire town is actually privately

owned and was designed from the ground up. Robert Davis built it after he inherited the

80 acres. 3 – Cars – Radiator Springs

• The town of 'Radiator Springs' in Cars is located along Route 66 in the USA.

• While there is no town called Radiator Springs in reality, the fictional town and

its landmarks were all modelled on real places along route.

• For example, 'Ramone's body art shop' closely resembles the 'U-drop gasoline station

and restaurant'; The 'Cozy Cone Motel' is modelled after the Wigwam Motels; the radiator

Cap Mountains are inspired by the Tucumcari Mountains, and Cadillac range is a composite

of the Black Mountain in Arizona and Cadillac Ranch in Texas.

2 – Harry Potter - Hogwarts • Although Harry Potter takes place in a

magical world, you can visit many of the locations without stepping foot in a theme park.

• For the first two films, Alnwick castle in Northumberland doubled as Hogwarts. Platform

9 ¾ can be found at Kings Cross Station in London; the Hogwarts express travels along

the West Highland line in Scotland, and passes over the Glenfinnan Viaduct just like in the

films; and 'The Great Hall' is really Christ Church at Oxford.

• As for 4 Privet drive – well it's actually 12 Picket Close.

1 – GoT – Westeros (various) • Game of Thrones makes use of many of Europe's

historical cities to double for the cities of the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros, and Essos,

as well as the varying landscapes. • The Maltese Capital Mdina and Dubrovnik,

on the Coast of Croatia, have both served as King's Landing.

• Many of the Northern Locations are found in Northern Ireland Including 'Winterfell',

really Castle Ward just outside Belfast. A national park in Iceland is used for the frozen

wastes beyond the wall, and Morocco is used for many of the cities in Essos.

For more infomation >> 15 "Fictional" Places You Didn't Know Actually Exist - Duration: 7:57.

-------------------------------------------

No Deal - Ixxión (One Shot) - Duration: 2:17.

For more infomation >> No Deal - Ixxión (One Shot) - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Tillerson Goes Head-to-Head With McCain, DESTROYS Him With 1 Sentence - Duration: 3:16.

John McCain has proven to our country time and time again why he is incompetent.

All that you need to do is listen to him speak for a couple of seconds, and you will get

the gist.

Rex Tillerson was having NONE of his nonsense!

Washington Times reported that it all started when McCain attempted to make everyone believe

that Tillerson was hurting EVERYONE'S feelings and needed to stop.

McCain quoted these mystical "oppression policies," and eventually, Rex had enough.

His reply shut down McCain; "You don't know what you're talking about, John."

We think that this response by Rex is PERFECT.

Essentially, John was saying that Tillerson was passing policies that were meant to be

for transactional purposes, instead of what felt good deep in your heart.

In his piece, McCain wrote, "Tillerson [has] sent a message to oppressed people everywhere,

'Don't look to the United States for hope.'"

Here is the problem.

We are not the international Super Friends.

In the United States, we don't have an unlimited amount of space, resources, and time.

PRIORITIES MUST be set.

If priorities are in place, it would only make logical sense that we would help the

people HERE before we would work on helping everyone else in the world.

McCain honestly believes that we need to go on a mission to help everyone else in the

world and let everyone here suffer.

It is odd; his feelings and emotions only kick in once he is speaking about outside

of the U.S. border.

There is a reason that Tillerson is on Trump's Cabinet.

On that same note, there is also a reason why the only time McCain has a voice that

can be heard is when he is writing trash that passes for New York Times opinion pieces.

We are not surprised that McCain is still trying to push his agenda through.

He may have run on the Republican ticket, but make no mistake; he is a liberal in right-wing

clothes.

Most people who took the time to read through some of the things he has stated in the past

agree that it couldn't be any clearer.

Look at this recent argument for an excellent example of his values.

He is critiquing the Republican party for putting our country first!

Ironically enough, one of his slogans when running for president was "Country First."

It sure doesn't look that way now!

He has what can only be called "imposter syndrome."

Don't let him fool you; Rex obviously didn't.

It is going to be interesting to see if McCain is going to formulate a rebuttal to Tillerson's

single sentence.

Personally, we doubt it.

It is going to end up lost in the mix when he comes out for his next attack against a

policy or person who makes his poor feelings hurt.

We don't have TIME or RESOURCES to take care of everyone outside of our country.

We need to get everything in good shape HERE first.

You cannot do 15 million things at once and expect to be successful.

The fact that he thought his critique was accurate is laughable.

If it were up to McCain, he would probably kick everyone out of their homes here and

move in people from other countries that "deserve nicer things."

What a JOKE!

Do YOU take McCain seriously as a Republican?

Please share this news and let us know what you think!

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Tillerson Goes Head-to-Head With McCain, DESTROYS Him With 1 Sentence - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

GETTING THE GREATEST TROLL HAND, GREATEST PLAYS | Uno w/ Bodil & Vegeto - Duration: 1:06:38.

For more infomation >> GETTING THE GREATEST TROLL HAND, GREATEST PLAYS | Uno w/ Bodil & Vegeto - Duration: 1:06:38.

-------------------------------------------

Gospel of the day Saturday, May 20, 2017 - Duration: 15:33.

For more infomation >> Gospel of the day Saturday, May 20, 2017 - Duration: 15:33.

-------------------------------------------

Maxed coin stack time - Duration: 10:04.

maybe shut up bro ah bro my voice iss

better than the song man where am i

dying nope okay would it be shut up bro

this voice is beautiful man guys what am

I getting can we can we just repeat this

to ourselves people are saying guts in

Samsung same guy like some guys I'm

getting bullshit thank you very much

what do you mean we're playing jeopardy

again one more time boys dude what are

we gonna get full full directs no full

guttin you know what I think I'm

actually gonna get full gut ins and

directs and maybe you know you can throw

in a Crow's good I mean if you want to

throw in the curls pops - that's fine

maybe maybe full tar Greg's man you know

animate this woof

oh okay okay okay okay not bad not bad

hello guys it is me again and welcome to

another loot video in which today we

have stuff to talk about

first and foremost guys the 100 ml disco

giveaway is happening this Monday which

is in three days which is made at 22nd

I'll talk about that more dn+ as usual

tons of giveaways going on on this

channel on a daily basis to enter be

sure to smash that like button and to

comment something down below we also

talked about that briefly at the end now

guys let me tell you slayer what the

canon is the most beautiful and graceful

XP you are ever going to get you

literally just open up the runescape

client you draw on a cannon you put on

protect from melee and boom it is all

done for you you literally you know your

afk while the kind of does work and

you're getting a bunch of XP I can't

even count the amount of times I leveled

up but boy did I level up and recently I

was introduced to a very very special

Slayer monster I like to call the neck

real I think that's what it's literally

called I like to call it that anyway I

mean that's the name writing that girl

but these this task is really amazing

because if you burst neck rails every

single task you get a minimum of like 60

kxp which is a lot plus you get like

over 300,000 magic XP if you think I'm

joking I went from 92 93 magic only when

necro tasks and I only got like six or

seven tasks not many but since every

task is like 300k XP every two tasks I'm

leveling up I'm actually close to 94

magic solely from justice task which is

very very Opie now during Slayer

grinding I got kind of wood so what I

decided to do was make some potions I

believe I was making some prayer potions

which is pretty good XP I still have

$500 in the bank which is a total of

like what four K pray potions that's

going to be fun to farm but I'm not

quite doing that you know now I'll talk

about that later on but also I got a

whole bunch of what's it called prayer

not prayer potions attack and

emotion so the supplies to make that so

I also made that and I believe I'm at

like sixty hope you'll allow for like

fifty something that is really really

good now what also makes it good is that

fifty-eight herblore you're able to use

the herb sack which is a really Opie

item I recommend you like get that as

soon as possible now it is 750 slave

buns but boy is that bingo peak because

up until now when I do Slayer my

inventory is full with food supplies and

potions so every time I get a herb drop

it's gone I can't pick it up because my

inventory will be full but with the herb

sack it stores sturdy of every herb in

one item in one slot so when you pick up

a hood you just click the sack and in

the hub is like stored in there so when

I do like a Reber actual spec aberrant

specter ease so whatever you call them

the green glowing things they drop like

a minimum of like a hundred herbs but

you know 100 of different herbs Slayer

tasks so those tasks are now fun because

I'm able to actually pick up every

single hope they dropped only because of

the herb sack and I goes for many other

tasks you're just killing the monster

you just pick up the hood boom you store

it into the sack which is really really

really Oh Pete now I've always been

wondering what I was going to do on this

iron man originally I wanted to get 99

Slayer but then I think I have changed

my mind because I don't really play I'm

a mode as much as I used to so I might

as well do something that is pretty

useless on an i man and that is go for

max cash and I believe the best way to

get coins and when I say max cash I'm

talking coins not you know max cash item

value I believe gargoyles is the best

thing to do so what I'm doing right now

is I'm getting supplies to go ahead and

camp gargoyles efficiently bludgeon is

off the list there's no way I'm going to

be killing the abyssal sire I've never

killed that before and it looks like

it's going to be a pain to get it so the

first thing I needed was the next best

thing which is a whip and a dragon

defender or whip and a DFS

the next thing I got to do is to upgrade

my boots because at the moment I have

ruined boots still which is kind of

newbie and I am 85 Slayer meaning I can

just simply go to God was done during

really quickly and pick up a pair of D

boots which took like well it's a kind

of a while but then again D boots are

pretty much common so that it didn't

take as much as it did to get the whoops

let me tell getting the whip was kind of

annoying first of all I was just afk

mailing them for like three hundred

kills nothing I tried bursting them for

another three hundred kills nothing I

even went ahead and used the dark light

on the abyssal demons nothing and then I

ended up just AF King mailing them again

with a dis gaem and then I got it at

like I think nine hundred kills which

isn't too bad because it's one in 500

chance so it's kind of average to get a

whip around 1k I believe so it I wasn't

too unlucky but it was kind of annoying

and now the last piece of gear I need is

the piece of gear that is going to take

my peace of mind

I need to go back to barrows and get

full gut ins now you guys already know I

did I hate barrows with a passion okay I

really really don't like barrows because

I always got nothing man I want to know

why hey barrows because I have two guts

and Spears and two gut ins chests body

or whatever you call it that could have

just been full Gardens right there but

nope you had to give me the spear twice

you had to give me the gut ins body

twice that just triggers me and now I

have to grovel and go back there and get

full gut ins once that is once I got

forgotten once I got the whip once I got

the D boots and everything I can safely

camp gargoyles to Max cash and become

the richest eye man in the game coin

wise I believe when I get to like a four

hundred mil cash stack I would be the

richest I'm an make me proof if I'm

wrong but I've never seen an eye man

with over a 300 mil cash stack why not

because it's hard to do it's because

it's pointless why would you need 300

mil cash it's like a serious waste of

time but I'm going to do it since I'm

kind of done with I'm I'm owed at this

point I just want to get max cash I want

at least a big achievement so I can just

be like okay done with this game Bruce

out maybe max out after then who knows I

might even quit getting the max cash who

knows but that's what I'm gonna go for

at the moment

got max compacted because the

interesting thing about gargoyles is

that on the way to get a max cache with

the whip I'm going to get 99 attack

strength defense HP but I'm also going

to get 99 smithing because they drop a

lot of gold ore and gold ore at blast

furnace its 200k an hour and by the time

I've killed so many gargoyles out I have

enough gold to get 99 smithing and pure

essence to get 99 runecrafting so it

might end there depending on how good I

am of them but they seem pretty F cable

like I can watch the while killing them

so I'll just have to see so this is the

end of the video let's quickly talk

about this code giveaway then you have a

giveaway and we are done

so yes guys there is a 100 ml discord

giveaway raffle happening on Monday May

22nd to enter all you got to simply do

is click the Disco's link down below it

should be at the top of the description

and you also have to be level 10 on the

discord which doesn't take too much time

all you got to do is be active in a

disco talk to people do whatever you

want to do and you will gain XP and

eventually you'll get level 10 and when

I do the raffle it's only going to be

picked with people who are level 10

meaning only active people will have a

chance to win 100 mill also if you guys

want to swap his three options now you

can do one wait for me to stream because

I do swap on stream too you can even go

to the disco dance swap there's an admin

on there she can swap for you and the

third option is my swapping plan

whatever you want to do also let's talk

about the other giveaways I do I do

giveaways on a daily basis two went to

that all you got to do is comment from

the number going to give this video a

like ah the winning comment for today is

somebody who commented the fact that his

video about his video my video didn't

come up on the feed on his YouTube feed

which is weird I noticed that if your

videos don't do good YouTube tends to

not put on people's feet sometimes I

don't know how the algorithm works but

be sure next to the description button

hit the bell button and that will for

sure make my videos pop up if you wanted

to be not too fond of my videos you

don't care about it don't worry but if

you want to see the videos on the feed

be sure to click that bell but having

said you guys enjoy your day please

For more infomation >> Maxed coin stack time - Duration: 10:04.

-------------------------------------------

Toddlers at a Table Drinking Milkshakes | How to Scare Bullies Away - Duration: 1:38.

KESLER: Was your day good baby?

What did you do at daycare baby?

What did you do guys? What did you do at daycare guys?

Did you got bullied baby?

BROOKE: No.

KESLER: Did you got bullied?

Who bullied you?

I'm your big brother, I'm going to look after you okay?

If anybody is bullying you, I'll stop them.

If someone wants to steal your chocolate and I see that...

...I'm going to tell my friend Eric and he'll come back and do his loud roar if I tell him.

Do this... ROAR!!!

QUINN: Roar.

KESLER: That's a little one.

Can you do rah.

BROOKE: Roar.

KESLER: Can you do it together guys?

QUINN: ROAR!

KESLER: Can you do it? QUINN: Roar!

QUINN: Roar, roar, roar!

BROOKE: Roar!

QUINN: Rooooaaaar!

KESLER: The loud roar will scare the bullies away!

That's why it's really loud!

KESLER: Subscribe to my channel!

For more infomation >> Toddlers at a Table Drinking Milkshakes | How to Scare Bullies Away - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

VLOG 1 | Worldbuilding au parc - Duration: 4:13.

Hi everyone! I hope everyone's fine.

Today I really wanted to film a video so, because I'm going to work

on my story, I thought it would be interesting to share

this moment with you.

Today I would like to work a bit on À travers la glace.

It's my principal project for this summer.

I talk about this story in my video "My writing projects" and in my video "My writing goals

for this summer." I'm going to link one of those two videos somewhere,

so you'll be able to click and see it if you're curious.

So À travers la glace, I'm still in the worldbuilding phase.

I was quite advanced but I have decided to change

the world in which the story takes place. It's hard to explain.

But basically this story, I've been working on it for a very, very long time.

I think the first time I worked on this story it was in 2014.

And it evolved a lot since the very first draft and the first things I wrote

about it. The story was supposed to take place in a world where there's only one season :

a very, very long winter.

With one climate where it's cold constantly and there's ice and snow all the time,

and it annoyed me and if it annoys me when I'm worldbuilding I can't imagine

spending many months writing in this world.

So I have decided to diversify a bit the background.

I was also writing something with kings and queens, etc. but it annoyed me too. I thought

that it wasn't original enough. So I have decided to change that and to create a clan system.

I won't develop too much because I don't want to spoil this story.

I really want to share it with the world some time.

So it's what I'm doing right now, I'm working on my different

clans. It's really great and I have a lot of fun.

And that's what I'm doing today. So I'm going to the park and I'll continue to

work on that.

I'm back!

Now I'm adding pictures. I went to Pintinterest... Pinterest

and I looked for pictures to illustrate my work.

I'm really proud of myself because I have made a lot of progress.

I did the biggest work about my clans.

Once again I don't want to tell too much but now I know who they... really what

those clans are, how it works in those different clans. So I'm really happy with myself.

I also progressed a lot on the geography. I had finished everything about the geography but

as I said at the beginning of this video, I have decided to redo everything. I have decided to change

the geography of this country. So I was working on that.

And I also made a lot of progress so I'm happy.

And now I'm having fun as I said, I'm looking for pictures to illustrate my work.

Because what I would like to do when I'm finished with my worldbuilding,

is to gather all the informations about my world in a PDF document

and to print that PDF document. And then to bind it or to staple it or something

to have some kind of physical bible with all the informations

at the same place.

So I'm having fun by making everything pretty and by doing pretty text effects

with pictures and everything. I don't know if you can see it but that's what I'm entertaining myself with.

It's a really short vlog I think, where nothing really happens,

but in the end writing, well, what is it? Except sitting at a computer typing?

It's not really... it's not really eventful.

I still really enjoyed doing this today so I think I'll remake videos like this

to show you a little how I progress in my work and maybe

change the background, show you a bit more of my writing routine. I think it would be fun.

Do you that think it would be fun ?

Thank you so much for watching until now, I'll see you very, very soon!

Bye! Ouch!

For more infomation >> VLOG 1 | Worldbuilding au parc - Duration: 4:13.

-------------------------------------------

Switzerland Completely Abolished Mammography Screenings - health - Duration: 13:48.

Switzerland Completely Abolished Mammography Screenings: Here�s Why You Should Probably

Never Get One

In 2013, the Swiss Medical Board, an independent health technology assessment initiative, was

requested to prepare a review of mammography screening.

The team of medical professionals included a medical ethicist, a clinical epidemiologist,

a pharmacologist, an oncologic surgeon, a nurse scientist, a lawyer, and a health economist.

Two of those members, Nikola Biller-Andorno, M.D. Ph.

D. and Peter Juni, M.D, opened up about the project in the New England Journal of Medicine.

�As we embarked on the project, we were aware of the controversies that have surrounded

mammography screening for the past 10-15 years.

When we received the available evidence and contemplated its implications in detail, however,

we became increasingly concerned.�

In 2016, it is estimated that approximately 246,660 new cases of invasive breast cancer

will be diagnosed in women in the United States as well as 61,000 new cases of non-invasive

breast cancer.

Mammograms continue to be touted as the most effective screening tool we have today to

find breast cancer.

However, these two doctors were shocked to discover that there is minimal evidence that

actually indicates that the benefits of mammography screening outweigh the harms.

�The relative risk reduction of approximately 20 percent in breast-cancer mortality associated

with mammography that is currently described by most expert panels came at the price of

a considerable diagnostic cascade, with repeat mammography, subsequent biopsies, and over-diagnosis

of breast cancers � cancers that would never have become clinically apparent.�

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study, which was conducted over the course of 25

years, concluded that 106 of 484 screen-detected cancers were over-diagnosed.

The doctors explained:

�This means that 106 of the 44,925 healthy women in the screening group were diagnosed

with and treated for breast cancer unnecessarily, which resulted in needless surgical interventions,

radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or some combination of these therapies.�

The fact that the benefits of this form of cancer screening are so overestimated seems

worrisome for the medical community and patients at large.

How, in this day and age, do we not have more awareness, more answers, and better technology?

Another review of 10 trials involving more than 600,000 women discovered no evidence

that mammography screening was effective on overall mortality.

This caused concern over the benefits of the medical practice.

A survey of U.S. women�s views on the mammography screenings discovered that 71.5 percent of

women think that it lessened risk of death from breast cancer by half, while 72.1 percent

believed that 80 deaths could be avoided per each 1,000 women screened.

Their perceptions were gravely over-calculated.

In fact, when looking at the real numbers, mammography results in a risk reduction of

20 percent and only 1 death can be prevented per 1,000 women screened.

The Swiss Medical Board report became public in February 2014, provoking the board to advise

that the quality of mammography screening ought to be evaluated and that women should

be educated about both the benefits and the harms of the medical practice.

The report created controversy within the Swiss medical community, even though it supports

a growing perspective around the world that mammography for breast cancer screening in

asymptomatic populations is outdated and harmful at best.

When reviewing the data in regards to every breast cancer death prevented in U.S. women

over a 10-year period of yearly screening starting at the age of 50, you will find that:

490-670 women usually have a false positive mammogram with repeat examination

70-100 women usually have an unnecessary biopsy

3-14 women were the victim of over-diagnosed breast cancer that would never reach clinical

relevance

Furthermore, up to 50 percent of women have breast tissue that is dense.

This makes it very hard to read mammograms correctly, as dense breast tissue and cancer

both show up white on an X-ray.

Due to the lack of evidence in support of mammography and the clear potential risks

involved with them, the board chose to recommend cancelling mammography-screening programs

altogether.

Although their recommendations are not legally binding, the report caused an uproar amongst

Swiss cancer experts and organizations.

The doctors on board reported:

�One of the main arguments used against it was that it contradicted the global consensus

of leading experts in the field� Another argument was that the report unsettled women,

but we wonder how to avoid unsettling women, given the available evidence.�

It�s clearly no mystery why the board become increasingly concerned about their researcher.

The �evidence� simply does not back up the global consensus of other experiences

in the field suggesting that mammograms were safe and capable of saving lives.

When it comes down to it, we are dealing with outdated clinical trials, the benefits do

not clearly outweigh the harms, and women�s perceptions of mammography benefits do not

match reality,

More Information On Breast Screenings

I believe that if you did have a tumor, the last thing you would want to do is crush that

tumor between two plates, because that would spread it.

� Dr. Sarah Mybill, General Practitioner

I think if a woman from the age of 50 has a mammogram every year, or every two years,

she�s going to get breast cancer as a direct result from that � Dr. Patrick Kingsley,

Clinical Ecologist

In 2011, 220,097 women and 2,078 men in the United States were diagnosed with breast cancer,

and 40,931 women and 443 men in the United States died from breast cancer.

It has become the most common type of cancer among women.

Below is a trailer to a documentary entitled, �The Promise.� The film interviews various

researchers, scientists, doctors (and more), all of whom are hoping to shed light on a

practice which is turning out to be not only useless, but harmful to those taking part.

There is more information below the video, but I highly recommend you watch the documentary

There is a wealth of scientific data concluding that mammograms are not, as the CDC claims,

the most effective way to detect breast cancer.

In fact, having a mammogram is likely the last thing you want to do if you have breast

cancer.

A study published in The European Journal of Public Healthtitled �Trends in breast

cancer stage distribution before, during and after introduction of a screening programme

in Norway� found that breast screenings actually increase the incidence of localized

stage cancers without reducing the incidence of advanced cancers.

The study, which used a huge population sample of 1.8 million Norwegian women diagnosed with

breast cancer from 1987 � 2010, found that:

�The annual incidence of localized breast cancer among women aged 50�69 years rose

from 63.9 per 100 000 before the introduction of screening to 141.2 afterwards, corresponding

to a ratio of 2.21 (95% confidence interval: 2.10; 2.32).

�The incidence of more advanced cancers increased from 86.9 to 117.3 per 100 000 afterwards,

corresponding to a 1.35 (1.29; 1.42)-fold increase.

Advanced cancers also increased among younger women not eligible for screening, whereas

their incidence of localized cancers remained nearly constant.�

This study outlines how Norway�s breast screening program has actually increased the

chance of being diagnosed with early stage breast cancer by more than 200%, as well contributing

to an increased chance of receiving advanced stage breast cancer diagnosis by 35%.

This is the opposite of what mammograms are supposed to do; if they were useful then the

incidence of cancers would be lower and not higher.

The study concluded that:

Incidence of localized breast cancer increased significantly among women aged 50�69 years

old after introduction of screening, while the incidence of more advanced cancers was

not reduced in the same period when compared to the younger unscreened age group.

It�s important to note that, �although the study did measure the impact of Norway�s

breast screening programme, a comparison of trends between participants and non-participants

in the age group eligible for screening warrants further investigation.

Also the causal link between stage distribution and mortality needs to be investigated in

the context of screening.�

A paper published in 2011 in the British Medical Journal set out to prove that breast screening

by mammography is associated with a steeper fall in mortality cancer compared to other

countries who were not offering this service.

They did not expect to find the complete opposite; they found a drop in breast cancer mortality

among women who were not screened.

They concluded that the recent downward trend in breast cancer mortality had nothing to

do with screening and everything to do with improvements in treatment and service provision.

The new data published in the BMJ now suggests that none of the gratifying falls in breast

cancer can be attributed to screening and that the very existence of a NHSBSP (national

breast screening programme) should be questioned.

Unless there is public pressure for an independent inquiry to challenge the status quo, it will

be business as usual for the screening programme.

Furthermore, the Department of Health has painted itself into a corner and it is no

longer a question of scientific debate � the subject has become too politicized by those

who like to avoid U-turns at all costs.

� Michael Baum, Professor Emeritus of Surgery and visiting Professor of Medical Humanities

at University College London, is a leading British surgical oncologist who specializes

in breast cancer treatment

This would be an asymptomatic woman walking along the high street, having a mammogram,

and then two weeks later she�s told she has to have a mastectomy.

This is so cruel that it should make you weep.

(quote taken from the documentary trailer above)

As Sayer Ji, founder of Greenmedinfo.com points out, a National Cancer Institute commissioned

expert panel concluded that �early stage cancers� are not cancer, they are benign

or indolent growths.

This means that millions of women were wrongly diagnosed with breast cancer over the past

few decades and have been subjected to harmful treatment, when they would have been better

off leaving it untreated or diagnosed; frighteningly, it is not uncommon for a breast cancer misdiagnosis

to occur.

Another study that was recently published in the British Medical Journal concluded that

regular mammogram screenings do not reduce breast cancer death rates.

And they found no evidence to suggest that mammograms are more effective than personal

breast exams at detecting cancer in the designated age group.

The study involved 90, 000 Canadian women and compared breast cancer incidence and mortality

up to 25 years in women aged 40-59.

The study was conducted over a period of 25 years.

Many Studies Showing The Same Thing

The sheer number of studies that have been published on breast mammography examinations

and their failure to produce a benefit in screened populations is overwhelming.

What�s even more disturbing is the fact that these types of examinations have also

been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer, and to have negative implications

for both physical and mental health.

U-turns do not embarrass clinical scientists, unlike politicians: if the evidence changes

then our minds must change.

As the national programme began to run its course, two disturbing observations made me

begin to question my original support.

First, about 10 years after the initiation of the service, updated analyses of the original

data set by independent groups in Europe and the US found that the initial estimate of

benefit in the reduction of breast cancer mortality was grossly exaggerated.

� Michael Baum, Professor Emeritus of Surgery and visiting Professor of Medical Humanities

at University College London, is a leading British surgical oncologist who specializes

in breast cancer treatment

For more infomation >> Switzerland Completely Abolished Mammography Screenings - health - Duration: 13:48.

-------------------------------------------

Anticipate some showers as cool down sets in - Duration: 3:09.

>> NOW THE WGAL NEWS EIGHT STORM

TEAM FORECAST WITH METEOROLOGIST

MATT MOORE.

MATT: THREE DAYS IN A ROW NEAR

90.

IT'S VERY WARM OUT THERE.

WE ARE LOOKING LIVE FROM OUR

SKYCAM.

SO FAR, IT'S NOT BAD.

AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE SKY CAM,

JUST A COUPLE CLOUDS IN THE SKY.

IT IS 86 DEGREES CURRENTLY AN

EFFORT.

THE DEW POINTS ARE IN THE 60'S.

ANYTIME WE TALK ABOUT DEW POINTS

IN THE 60'S, IT STARTS TO FEEL

STICKY.

WE ARE PRETTY CLOSE TO THAT,

ALTHOUGH WE DO HAVE A SOUTHWEST

BREEZE AT 10 MILES PER HOUR,

MAKING THINGS FEEL A LITTLE BIT

BETTER.

WE ARE TRACKING A COLD FRONT,

OFF TO OUR NORTH AND WEST, AND

IT WILL BE DROPPING THROUGH DOWN

TO THE SOUTH AS WE GO THROUGHOUT

THIS EVENING, KEEPING THE CHANCE

OF A SHOWER OR STORM IN THE

FORECAST.

WE HAVE A FEW OF THEM.

OUR CURRENT AIR TEMPERATURES ARE

SOMEWHERE IN THE MID TO UPPER

80'S ACROSS OUR AREA.

A COUPLE HOURS AGO, JUST ABOUT

72.

WE DID SEE SOME RAIN MOVE

THROUGH GETTYSBURG, AND WE DO

HAVE A COUPLE OF POCKETS OF

DOWNPOURS.

ONE ISOLATED THUNDERSTORM IS

RUNNING RIGHT ALONG THE

MASON-DIXON LINE, AND THERE'S A

COUPLE ADDITIONAL SHOWERS TO THE

SOUTHEAST OF HANOVER.

AT LEAST HERE LOCALLY, THAT'S

IT.

FARTHER NORTH AND WEST, WE DO

HAVE ADDITIONAL SHOWERS AND

STORMS, WHICH WE WILL HAVE TO

WATCH FOR.

I DO BELIEVE AS THE SUN SETS, A

LOT OF THIS ACTIVITY WILL BEGIN

TO WIND DOWN.

WE WILL LOSE THE DAYTIME

HEATING.

QUICK COOLING TAKES PLACE LATE

THIS EVENING, AND THAT IS AS THE

COLD FRONT DROPS IN FROM NORTH

TO SOUTH.

TEMPERATURES WILL RESPOND BY

FALLING FROM THE LOW 80'S DOWN

TO ABOUT 70 LATE THS EVENING.

TONIGHT, IT'S A QUICK DROP INTO

THE 50'S FOR OVERNIGHT LOWS.

FOR THE WEEKEND, IT WILL BE

COOLER, NOT AS STICKY, BUT WE

WILL HAVE CLOUDS TO DEAL WITH

WITH AN EASTERLY WIND AND THE

CHANCE FOR A COUPLE OF SHOWERS

TOMORROW.

IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE ANYTHING

HEAVY, MAINLY JUST SPOTTY

SHOWERS.

THERE COULD BE A SHOWER FOR THE

PREAKNESS STAKES KICKING OFF IN

THE AFTERNOON.

YOU CAN WATCH THAT RIGHT HERE ON

WGAL.

THERE'S A CHANCE OF A SHOWER

INTO THE AFTERNOON HOURS.

HERE'S THAT COLD FRONT WE WERE

TALKING ABOUT.

COOLER AIR, JUST OFF TO THE

NORTH AND WEST, AND IT WILL BE

QUICK TO ARRIVE LATE THIS

EVENING AND THROUGH THE

OVERNIGHT HOURS.

LET'S TIME THINGS OUT AS WE GO

THROUGH THE REST OF THE EVENING.

THERE ARE A COUPLE OF SPOTTY HIT

OR MISS STORMS.

EVERYTHING SETTLES DOWN

OVERNIGHT TONIGHT, BUT CLOUDS

ARE PRETTY STUBBORN FOR US INTO

TOMORROW MORNING WITH A COUPLE

OF SHOWERS POSSIBLE BEFORE THE

CLOUDS THIN OUT.

MID 60'S FOR THOSE HIGHS.

SUNDAY, IT'S A COOL START TO THE

MORNING WITH A SHOWER LATE.

THE RAIN CHANCE IS LITTLE HIGHER

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét