AISHWARYA RAI MEHNDI & WEDDING VIDEO IS A MUST MUST WATCH| | UNSEEN GOLDEN MOMENTS
Questions and Doubts Surface on Recent UFO Video Disclosures
BY Brett Tingley
In December 2017, the Tom DeLonge-fronted To The Stars Academy (TTSA) released two videos
it claimed showed U.S. military aircraft encountering unidentified aerial phenomenon.
Around the same time, The New York Times released a report detailing a massive Pentagon program
aimed at collecting evidence of UFOs and related phenomenon.
The videos became mainstream news for a while, prompting warnings from veteran UFO researchers
about trusting these �official� sources.
Things got more interesting earlier this month when TTSA released a third video they claimed
showed yet another encounter between an F/A-18 and a fast-moving object flying above the
ocean off America�s east coast.
While these videos have become some of the most talked-about pieces of UFO evidence in
recent history, a wide range of sources from across the web are raising doubts about their
authenticity.
A research academy fronted by a former pop-punk singer wouldn�t lie to us, would it?
In a reddit post titled �Buckle up boys � you�re about to get learnt�, user
Blu3Skies lays out evidence claiming that TTSA�s latest two video releases could be
hoaxes.
The post was submitted to the r/ConspiracyII forum, which split off of r/Conspiracy after
it became flooded with, uh, let�s call it �political� content.
In the post, Blu3Skies cites the fact that the heads-up display overlaid on top of both
videos seems to display the same PRF code, or pulse repetition frequency, a unique numerical
identifier assigned to specific aircraft for specific sorties:
Why would 2 F18s have matching PRF codes on different coasts even if at different time
frames?
They wouldn�t.
Plain and simple.
For years I used the same PRF code overseas without it ever changing once as did every
major air asset I worked with.
As a military aviator I find this fishy as f*** now- something doesn�t add up here.
Other reddit users noted that those codes could have been altered after being declassified
to make them appropriate for public release.
They are clearly spliced together from longer pieces of footage, after all, implying that
there could be still much in the videos concerning flight formations or capabilities theDepartment
of Defense doesn�t want known.
A spokesperson for the Department of Defense issued a terse, informationless statement
in the way only the DoD can, stating merely �The Department of Defense did not release
those videos.
I cannot confirm their authenticity.
I don�t have any additional info to provide.�
Of course, the possibility remains that these videos could be hoaxes altogether, designed
to raise just enough public interest to justify�well, something.
Political news outlet The Hill ran an editorial this week claiming that the �only thing
Defense�s UFO probe proves is power of political favors.� The authors point out that the
main recipient of the Pentagon�s $22 million Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification program
was none other than UFO-obsessed aerospace entrepreneur Robert Bigelow.
The Las Vegas-based Bigelow just so happens to be a major campaign contributor to Nevada
senator and former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid who was instrumental in securing
funding for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification program.
Was this Pentagon-funded program merely a way to return the favor to a major source
of funding using taxpayer dollars?
It�s possible, and happens all the time.
Bigelow also wants to put inflatable hotels in space over the next ten years.
Bigelow also wants to put inflatable hotels in space over the next ten years.
Other skeptics and analysts have weighed in claiming that based on their appearance, the
objects are most likely balloons or flocks of birds misidentified by pilots in the moment.
Given the grainy and somewhat indistinct infrared footage in the videos, it�s difficult to
tell exactly what the objects are.
These claims make me wonder, though: would we be able to recognize and identify truly
anomalous phenomenon we�ve never encountered the first time we saw them, or would our minds
reach for familiar experiences and objects like balloons to help us make sense of them?
One of the most likely explanations for the release of these videos and the increased
attention unidentified aerial phenomena are receiving in the mainstream press is that
someone or perhaps something here on Earth has developed technological capabilities which
have surpassed those of the West.
Could China or Russia have developed next-generation propulsion methods unlike anything we�ve
ever seen?
If so, calling them UFOs and raising public support for increased funding in aerospace
research is a great way to boost military spending without frightening the public or
coming off too militaristic.
Then again, these videos could be evidence of new American air technology unbeknownst
to the public released by the DoD�s as a means of rattling their sabers in a public
setting.
But maybe, just maybe, these videos could be proof of something truly anomalous and
mysterious.
Could there be unknown extremely advanced civilizations living deep within the Earth
or under the seas operating sophisticated aircraft up here on the surface?
Or could we actually be witnessing contact with superior extraterrestrial civilizations?
Could these be evidence of some unknown type of matter or energy passing through Earth
as it zooms through the universe?
Who knows.
With so little to go on, any guess is as good as any.
But it�s going to take a lot more than a few short videos to convince the public of
whatever is happening here.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét